Trout on the Range

A Practical Guide for Managing Riparian Areas for Native Fish, Aquatic Life, Cattle, and Water Quality

Executive Summary

Riparian areas support native fish, aquatic invertebrates, amphibians, and other wildlife while supplying clean water and providing high-value forage and shade for livestock. These systems are productive and sensitive. Grazing can work with native aquatic communities if managers control timing, duration, and intensity, keep animals distributed, protect banks during wet periods, and track clear indicators. This guide synthesizes tested practices from federal technical guidance and watershed assessments, and translates them into concrete steps for ranchers, fisheries professionals, and state agencies.

While this guide emphasizes trout as an indicator species familiar to most managers, the management practices described here benefit entire aquatic ecosystems—including native suckers, chubs, darters, sculpins, and madtoms; aquatic macroinvertebrates that form the base of stream food webs; and amphibians such as salamanders and frogs that depend on cool, clean water and intact riparian habitats. More than three-quarters of terrestrial wildlife species also use riparian areas at some point in their life cycles (Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife [WDFW], 2024). The ripple effects of sound riparian grazing management extend far beyond trout alone.

Key takeaways:

• No single grazing system fits every riparian area. Design for the specific stream, plant community, soils, and operation (Wyman et al., 2006).

• Shade, bank stability, and low fine sediment benefit all aquatic life. Healthy riparian vegetation drives all three (Oregon Department of Environmental Quality [ODEQ], 2009).

• Short grazing periods, adequate rest, and strong distribution reduce concentrated pressure near water (Wyman et al., 2006).

• Set measurable objectives and monitor in season. Move animals when indicators are met. Adjust the plan each year.

• Protecting habitat for one group of aquatic species typically protects habitat for many others—a rising tide truly lifts all boats.

Table of Contents

1. Understanding Riparian Systems

2. The Challenge: Grazing and Water Quality

3. Trout Habitat Requirements

4. Beyond Trout: The Broader Aquatic Community

5. Core Management Principles

6. Proven Grazing Strategies

7. Animal Behavior, Class, and Breed Selection

8. Management Tools and Techniques

9. Monitoring and Adaptive Management

10. Implementation Steps

11. Case Examples and Lessons

12. Special Topics: Drought, Fire, and Multiple Stressors

13. References

1. Understanding Riparian Systems

Riparian areas sit at the interface of water and uplands. Groundwater, frequent saturation, and flood pulses shape these plant communities. Vegetation in this zone stabilizes banks, filters sediment and nutrients, shades the channel, contributes wood, and stores water that sustains baseflows. These functions support aquatic life and reduce downstream risks from flooding and turbidity (Poff, Koestner, Neary, & Henderson, 2011). Riparian wetlands serve as critical corridors for animal and plant dispersion in watersheds and provide ecosystem services including water quality improvement, flood abatement, and habitat support for biodiversity (Mitsch & Gosselink, 2015).

Connectivity matters. Riparian structure responds to upslope land use, roads, and hydrology, so management must consider the whole watershed, not only the greenline (Wyman et al., 2006; Leonard et al., 1997). Where riparian vegetation is sparse and human disturbance is high, streams show higher temperatures, lower wood, poorer substrate stability, and impaired biological condition (ODEQ, 2009).

2. The Challenge: Grazing and Water Quality

Cattle congregate near water for drinking, shade, and green forage. Without deliberate management, this leads to repeated defoliation, trampling on saturated soils, bank breakdown, channel widening, higher summer temperatures from canopy loss, and fine sediment entering spawning gravels (Wyman et al., 2006; Platts, 1991). Nonpoint source pollution pathways include sediment, nutrients, pathogens, and organic matter mobilized during storms or irrigation return flows (Cech, 2009).

Basin-scale watershed assessments show a consistent pattern: where riparian vegetation and canopy are impaired, warm-water and sediment problems expand, and fish and amphibian communities decline. In the Willamette Basin of Oregon, for example, more than 80% of agricultural and urban lands showed impaired biological conditions, with warm water temperature being the most extensive water quality impairment (ODEQ, 2009). Grazing pressure acts alongside other stressors such as water withdrawal, dams, invasive plants, wildfire, and land use change. These threats can interact and mask one another, so managers must diagnose causes carefully and treat the riparian system holistically (Poff et al., 2011).

3. Trout Habitat Requirements

Temperature

Trout require cold water. Different species have varying tolerances, but all three major trout species (brook, brown, and rainbow) begin to experience thermal stress at approximately 68°F (20°C), with stress increasing rapidly as temperatures rise further (Hatch Magazine, 2024; Matthews & Berg, 1997). Brook trout, being more sensitive, may experience stress at temperatures as low as 65°F (Penn's Woods West Trout Unlimited, 2024).

Loss of riparian shade raises thermal stress and lowers dissolved oxygen. The relationship between temperature and dissolved oxygen is critical—as water temperature increases, oxygen-carrying capacity decreases while fish metabolic demand increases (Pörtner, 2001). Basin-scale analyses show that streams with poor temperature conditions are far more likely to have impaired fish and amphibian communities; riparian canopy is a primary management lever for temperature control (ODEQ, 2009).

Sediment and Substrate

Fine sediment fills gravel interstices, smothers eggs, interferes with gill function, and reduces feeding success of juveniles (Platts, 1979). Disturbance near channels accelerates delivery of fines. Riparian vegetation traps and stores sediment on floodplains and protects banks from sloughing, thereby reducing sediment input to spawning habitat (Trimble, 1994; Winward, 2000).

Cover and Channel Complexity

Overhanging plants, undercut banks, large wood, and pool-riffle sequences provide refuge, feeding lanes, and thermal diversity. Woody riparian species supply future large wood and root strength that sustain these features over time (Poff et al., 2011; Gregory, Swanson, McKee, & Cummins, 1991).

4. Beyond Trout: The Broader Aquatic Community

While trout serve as useful indicator species, riparian management affects entire aquatic ecosystems. The same conditions that support trout—cold, clean water; stable substrates; and vegetated banks—benefit numerous native fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, many of which are species of greatest conservation concern.

Native Non-Salmonid Fishes

Suckers inhabit streams throughout the West, often in warmer reaches than trout. Species like Rio Grande sucker and flannelmouth sucker require clean gravel for spawning and benthic invertebrates for food (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service [USFWS], 2024). Several sucker species are state-listed as threatened or endangered due to habitat degradation.

Chubs and minnows play vital ecological roles. River chubs construct spawning nests—mounds of carefully moved stones—that provide spawning habitat for multiple other fish species (Georgia Department of Natural Resources [GADNR], 2024). Northern leatherside chub and other sensitive species select stream areas with overhead cover from mature woody riparian vegetation (Trout Unlimited, 2023).

Darters are small, colorful bottom-dwelling fish endemic to North America. Many species, including tangerine darter and trispot darter, require specific substrate conditions and flow patterns. Some darters migrate between habitats, requiring connected stream reaches (GADNR, 2024).

Sculpins inhabit cold, rocky streams with stable substrates. These bottom-dwelling predators require clean interstitial spaces in gravel and cobble (GADNR, 2024).

Madtoms, small catfish in the genus Noturus, are often rare and sensitive to sedimentation and habitat degradation. Species like yellowfin madtom and frecklebelly madtom require clean substrate for egg-laying (Conservation Fisheries, 2024).

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates

Benthic macroinvertebrates—mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies, and aquatic beetles—form the base of stream food webs. These organisms are sensitive to changes in water quality, temperature, and sediment (National Park Service [NPS], 2024). Riparian vegetation provides:

• Leaf litter and woody debris that serve as food and habitat

• Shade that maintains cool water temperatures

• Bank stability that prevents excessive sedimentation

• Terrestrial insects that fall into streams as fish food

Studies show that streams with degraded riparian areas have impoverished macroinvertebrate communities, which cascades up to affect fish and amphibian populations (Dauwalter et al., 2018).

Amphibians

Amphibians depend heavily on riparian areas for breeding, foraging, and dispersal. The moist, cool microclimate and dense vegetation provide essential habitat (WDFW, 2024).

Stream-associated salamanders such as Pacific giant salamander, torrent salamanders (Rhyacotriton spp.), and various Plethodon species inhabit headwater streams and adjacent riparian forests. These species are highly sensitive to temperature, moisture, and riparian buffer width (Olson & Van Horne, 2017; Thurman et al., 2022). More than 60% of headwater-stream associated amphibians in the Pacific Northwest are considered rare and of conservation concern.

Frogs and toads require aquatic habitats for breeding and riparian vegetation for cover from predators and desiccation. Species like northern red-legged frog and mountain yellow-legged frog depend on dense riparian vegetation and cool microclimates (Jennings, 1995).

Direct trampling by livestock can cause amphibian mortality, and loss of riparian cover exposes amphibians to increased predation and desiccation stress (Jennings, 1995).

Wildlife Corridors and Terrestrial Species

Riparian areas serve as movement corridors for elk, deer, and numerous smaller mammals. More than 75% of Washington's terrestrial species use riparian areas as habitat at some point in their lives (WDFW, 2024). Birds, including numerous neotropical migrants, depend on riparian vegetation for nesting and foraging habitat.

The Conservation Imperative

Many riparian-associated species are imperiled. In Georgia alone, 58 freshwater fish species are protected under state law, with 10 also protected federally (GADNR, 2024). Across the West, dozens of native fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates are species of greatest conservation concern. Habitat loss, degradation from poor land use practices (including improper grazing), water withdrawal, and climate change threaten these species.

The encouraging news: Management practices that maintain riparian function for trout simultaneously protect habitat for dozens of other species. Bank stability reduces fine sediment that smothers sucker eggs. Shade benefits temperature-sensitive chubs and salamanders. Vegetative cover protects frogs from predators and desiccation. The ecological services provided by healthy riparian vegetation—temperature regulation, sediment filtering, bank stabilization, and organic matter input—benefit entire aquatic communities (Oregon Conservation Strategy, 2024).

Managers implementing the practices described in this guide protect not only trout populations but also the broader biodiversity that makes western streams ecologically rich and resilient.

5. Core Management Principles

1. Design for the site, not the calendar. No cookbook prescriptions exist. Match grazing to stream type, sensitivity, soils, vegetation potential, recovery rates, and the ranch's logistics (Wyman et al., 2006).

2. Control timing, duration, and intensity. Rotate seasons and avoid grazing the same reach at the same time each year. Shorten use periods in riparian pastures relative to uplands. Keep defoliation moderate on key species (Wyman et al., 2006; Leonard et al., 1997).

3. Protect banks during wet conditions. Limit or avoid use when soils are saturated or during peak runoff. Maintain live roots and residual cover before high flows to dissipate energy, maintain shade, and trap sediment (Wyman et al., 2006; Clary & Webster, 1989).

4. Distribute animals. Use water developments, salt and supplement placement, herding, and strategic fencing to prevent loafing at water and to utilize uplands (Wyman et al., 2006).

5. Set measurable objectives. Example: increase stabilizing, late-seral greenline vegetation from 25% to 35% within 5 years at a defined key area (Wyman et al., 2006; Winward, 2000).

6. Monitor and adapt. Track in-season indicators such as stubble height, bank alteration, and woody browse. Adjust moves and stocking when thresholds are met (Wyman et al., 2006; Burton, Smith, & Cowley, 2011).

6. Proven Grazing Strategies

All systems depend on execution. Managers in successful operations keep use periods short near water, allow regrowth before re-entry, and move proactively when triggers are reached (Wyman et al., 2006).

6.1 Rest-Rotation

Rotates pastures so each receives full growing-season rest on a schedule. Benefits include periodic rest for root reserves and seedling establishment. Risks include late-season concentration in riparian zones if distribution tools are weak. Works best with adequate pasture numbers, realistic stocking, and complementary tools (Leonard et al., 1997).

6.2 Short-Duration with Long Rest

Very short grazing bouts (hours to a few days) followed by weeks to months of rest. Minimizes repeated defoliation and can improve distribution if combined with herding and off-stream water. Requires tight attention to moves before regrowth is bitten again (Wyman et al., 2006).

6.3 High-Intensity, Low-Frequency

Higher stock density for brief periods, then long recovery. Can reduce selectivity and shift pressure away from riparian zones if water and salt are placed well. Monitor closely to avoid trampling on saturated soils (Wyman et al., 2006).

6.4 Seasonal Strategies

Early-season use can keep cattle on upland green forage while riparian soils are wet (Clary & Webster, 1989). Late-season or dormant-season use can work if adequate residual cover remains for winter and spring flows. However, winter use has the potential to remove excessive amounts of vegetation cover just prior to spring runoff, and most streambanks need carryover vegetation for bank protection (Leonard et al., 1997). Avoid repeated fall use that reduces woody leader growth (Wyman et al., 2006).

Practice Rules That Cut Across Systems

• Avoid using the same reach at the same time each year

• Shorten riparian pasture use to roughly 25–30 days or less in a single season when feasible, with longer rest following

• Provide growing-season rest regularly for sedges, rushes, willows, and cottonwoods

• Coordinate moves with plant phenology, soil moisture, and stream hydrographs (Wyman et al., 2006; Leonard et al., 1997)

7. Animal Behavior, Class, and Breed Selection

Animal behavior shapes distribution as much as fencing or water. Managers should select and handle cattle that stay together, respond to riders, and use uplands readily (Wyman et al., 2006; Bailey, 2004).

Class Effects

Cow-calf pairs often remain closer to water, linger in shade, and revisit preferred sites. They require stronger distribution tools and shorter riparian use periods (Roath & Krueger, 1982).

Yearlings tend to range more widely and can be easier to place in uplands if water and salt are positioned well.

Bulls may wander or loaf depending on handling and pasture layout. Monitor closely during single-sex periods.

Breed and Line Selection

Lines within breeds vary in herding instinct, docility, and travel tendencies. Favor cattle with calm temperaments and strong herd bonds that accept placement in uplands. Avoid lines known for persistent creek-bottom loafing or high re-visit behavior to water points. Over time, cull habitual riparian loafers and retain cattle that graze uplands when asked. Pair genetic selection with low-stress stockmanship so animals learn to bed and graze away from streams (Wyman et al., 2006).

Stockmanship

Consistent, low-stress handling produces cattle that move, stay together, and hold on targeted ridges. Daily or near-daily rider presence during critical periods can cut riparian time dramatically when combined with strategic water and salt (Bailey, 2004).

8. Management Tools and Techniques

8.1 Off-Stream Water

Develop springs or wells and pipe to troughs placed away from streams. Design for reliable capacity or cattle will return to the creek. Place troughs to anchor upland use. Maintain systems so failures do not drive emergency use of the channel. Portable troughs offer flexibility (Wyman et al., 2006; Clary & Webster, 1989).

Placement tips:

• Site troughs well outside the riparian zone and away from shade that attracts loafing

• Cluster water and salt in desired use areas to create activity centers

8.2 Salt and Supplement Placement

Place salt and low-moisture blocks in underused uplands, never in or immediately adjacent to riparian areas. Move as grazing fronts advance so cattle continue to follow desired patterns (Wyman et al., 2006; Bailey, 2004).

8.3 Herding and Rider Presence

Use riders to place and hold cattle in uplands, pull them at mid-day from creek bottoms, and move herds before regrowth is bitten again. Plan rider-to-cow ratios that match terrain and herd behavior (Wyman et al., 2006).

8.4 Strategic Fencing

Create riparian pastures when needed to control timing and duration precisely. Avoid using the stream as a fence line. Provide water gaps or hardened access points, and plan for debris passage at crossings. Use wildlife-friendly specifications where applicable (Wyman et al., 2006).

8.5 Targeted Grazing

Apply short, well-timed use to shape vegetation structure or suppress problem plants. Use expert botanical knowledge and protect soils during wet conditions (Wyman et al., 2006).

9. Monitoring and Adaptive Management

Monitoring links plans to outcomes. Use implementation checks, in-season effectiveness indicators, and long-term trend data to adapt management (Wyman et al., 2006; Burton et al., 2011).

In-Season Indicators

Stubble height on bank-forming sedges and rushes at the greenline. Based on available research and knowledge of grazing characteristics, a 10 cm (approximately 4 inches) residual stubble height is recommended as a starting point for improved riparian grazing management (Clary & Leininger, 2000). Some situations may require adjustments:

• 7 cm or less may be adequate where streambanks are dry and stable or at high elevations where vegetation is naturally of low stature

• 15-20 cm may be needed to reduce willow browsing or limit trampling on vulnerable streambanks

• Cattle should be moved when stubble height for the most palatable herbaceous species reaches 7-8 cm (approximately 3 inches) to prevent shifting to shrub browsing (Clary & Leininger, 2000; Rangeland Gateway, 2024)

Bank alteration from hoof shear and pedestals. Set a threshold for action and record locations and severity (Burton et al., 2011).

Woody browse on current-year growth of willow and cottonwood leaders. Manage to maintain leader elongation during growing season (Wyman et al., 2006).

End-of-Season Checks

• Residual vegetation height before winter and spring flows

• Browse intensity and plant vigor of woody species

• Photo points from fixed locations (Burton et al., 2011)

Long-Term Trend

• Greenline species composition emphasizing stabilizing, late-seral plants (Winward, 2000)

• Channel form metrics such as width-to-depth, pool frequency, bank stability, and substrate condition (Burton et al., 2011)

Setting Objectives

Example objective: Increase stabilizing or late-seral riparian vegetation along the Deer Creek greenline transect at Key Area 2 from 25% to 35% within 5 years after the strategy begins (Wyman et al., 2006; Winward, 2000).

Adaptive management means changing timing, duration, or tools in the same season when indicators are reached, not waiting for next year (Wyman et al., 2006).

10. Implementation Steps

1. Assess conditions. Document vegetation, bank stability, and habitat structure using proper functioning condition assessments and monitoring protocols (Prichard et al., 1998; Winward, 2000).

2. Set objectives. Identify measurable goals for vegetation recovery and water quality that reflect site potential and watershed realities (Wyman et al., 2006).

3. Design strategy. Choose timing and duration based on plant needs, stream sensitivity, soil moisture conditions, and hydrologic risk (Wyman et al., 2006).

4. Implement tools. Install off-stream water and adjust salt placement to improve distribution. Use herding and strategic fencing as needed (Wyman et al., 2006).

5. Monitor and respond. Move livestock when utilization thresholds are reached, and adjust annually based on vegetation trend and channel metrics (Burton et al., 2011).

Successful implementation requires strong communication among ranchers, agencies, and fisheries professionals to ensure multiple values are protected (Wyman et al., 2006).

11. Case Examples and Lessons

Operations across the West show that riparian recovery follows when managers shorten use near water, provide growing-season rest, and hold animals in uplands with water, salt, and riders. Recovery proceeds fastest in streams with stable banks and resilient plant communities; sensitive reaches on noncohesive soils require stricter timing and sometimes temporary exclusion to jump-start recovery (Wyman et al., 2006; Clary & Kruse, 2004).

Common Success Factors

• Operator presence and commitment during the season

• Multiple tools used together rather than relying on a rotation alone

• Clear move triggers tied to stubble height, bank condition, and browse

• Collaboration among permittees, agencies, and fisheries staff (Wyman et al., 2006)

Common Pitfalls

• Long use periods in riparian pastures

• Repeated fall use that suppresses woody leader growth

• Salt or supplement left near water

• Water systems that fail and drive cattle back to the creek (Wyman et al., 2006)

12. Special Topics: Drought, Fire, and Multiple Stressors

Drought

Build flexibility into plans. Adjust stocking or shorten use when production drops, and protect residual cover for the following spring. Consider early weaning or altered breeding schedules to reduce demand. Maintain reliable off-stream water so animals do not return to channels (Wyman et al., 2006).

Wildfire and Prescribed Fire

Fire severity affects post-fire sedimentation and riparian response. Low to moderate severity fires often have limited immediate impacts on sedimentation, while high-severity fires can substantially increase sediment delivery and woody debris to channels, disrupting fluvial and biological processes (Poff et al., 2011; Pettit & Naiman, 2007). Time grazing to protect recovering banks and new riparian vegetation after fire, and watch for altered hydrologic responses during storms. The temporal processes of riparian recovery must be measured in decades, not years (Winward, 2000).

Cumulative Threats

Grazing effects may interact with water diversion, groundwater pumping, invasive species, mining legacies, or roads. The literature on threats to western riparian ecosystems shows that while grazing has been perceived as a dominant threat since the 1980s, it has been diminishing in recent decades, while invasive species, dams, and climate change are increasingly represented as threats (Poff et al., 2011). Address the causes of degradation, not only symptoms, and set objectives that reflect watershed realities.

13. References

Bailey, D. W. (2004). Management strategies for optimal grazing distribution and use of arid rangelands. Journal of Animal Science, 82(E-Suppl), E147-E153.

Burton, T. A., Smith, S. J., & Cowley, E. R. (2011). Riparian area management: Multiple indicator monitoring (MIM) of stream channels and streamside vegetation (Technical Reference 1737-23). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center.

Cech, T. V. (2009). Principles of water resources: History, development, management, and policy (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Clary, W. P., & Kruse, W. H. (2004). Livestock grazing effects on stream-side large woody debris: Lessons from the Buffalo Creek drainage in northern Colorado, USA. In P. M. Bennett & S. S. Wisdom (Eds.), Riparian ecosystems and buffers: Working papers (pp. 11-21). American Water Resources Association.

Clary, W. P., & Leininger, W. C. (2000). Stubble height as a tool for management of riparian areas. Journal of Range Management, 53(6), 562-573.

Clary, W. P., & Webster, B. F. (1989). Managing grazing of riparian areas in the Intermountain Region (General Technical Report INT-263). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.

Conservation Fisheries. (2024). Our successes. Retrieved from https://www.conservationfisheries.org/our-successes

Dauwalter, D. C., Walrath, J. D., & Rahel, F. J. (2018). Response of riparian vegetation, instream habitat, and aquatic biota to riparian grazing exclosures. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 38(5), 1187-1200.

Georgia Department of Natural Resources. (2024). Freshwater fishes. Retrieved from https://gadnrle.org/FreshwaterFish

Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., & Cummins, K. W. (1991). An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience, 41(8), 540-551.

Hall, F. C., & Bryant, L. (1995). Herbaceous stubble height as a warning of impending cattle grazing damage to riparian areas (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-362). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

Hatch Magazine. (2024). Trout and water temperature: How hot is too hot? Retrieved from https://www.hatchmag.com/articles/trout-and-water-temperature-how-hot-too-hot/771553

Jennings, M. R. (1995). Terrestrial and aquatic amphibians and reptiles. In Status of the Sierra Nevada: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, final report to Congress (pp. 31-54). University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.

Leonard, S., Kinch, G., Elsbernd, V., Borman, M., & Swanson, S. (1997). Riparian area management: Grazing management for riparian-wetland areas (Technical Reference 1737-14). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.

Matthews, K. R., & Berg, N. H. (1997). Rainbow trout responses to water temperature and dissolved oxygen stress in two southern California stream pools. Journal of Fish Biology, 50(1), 50-67.

Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2015). Wetlands (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

National Park Service. (2024). Aquatic macroinvertebrate monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/im/scpn/aquatic-macroinvertebrates.htm

Olson, D. H., & Van Horne, B. (2017). People, forests, and change: Lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Island Press.

Oregon Conservation Strategy. (2024). Flowing water and riparian habitats. Retrieved from https://www.oregonconservationstrategy.org/strategy-habitat/riparian-habitats-and-flowing-water/

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. (2009). Willamette Basin rivers and streams assessment report. Salem, OR: Author.

Penn's Woods West Trout Unlimited. (2024). Brook trout are particularly sensitive to high water temperatures. Retrieved from https://pwwtu.org/brook-trout-are-particularly-sensitive-to-high-water-temperatures/

Pettit, N. E., & Naiman, R. J. (2007). Fire in the riparian zone: Characteristics and ecological consequences. Ecosystems, 10(5), 673-687.

Platts, W. S. (1979). Relationships among stream order, fish populations, and aquatic geomorphology in an Idaho river drainage. Fisheries, 4(2), 5-9.

Platts, W. S. (1991). Livestock grazing (Special Publication 19, pp. 389-423). American Fisheries Society.

Poff, B., Koestner, K. A., Neary, D. G., & Henderson, V. (2011). Threats to riparian ecosystems in western North America: An analysis of existing literature. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47(6), 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00571.x

Pörtner, H. O. (2001). Climate change and temperature-dependent biogeography: Oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance in animals. Naturwissenschaften, 88(4), 137-146.

Prichard, D., Barrett, H., Cagney, J., Clark, R., Fogg, J., Gebhardt, K., Hansen, P. L., Mitchell, B., & Tippy, D. (1998). Riparian area management: Process for assessing proper functioning condition (Technical Reference 1737-9, Revision 1). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.

Rangeland Gateway. (2024). Riparian grazing management. Retrieved from https://rangelandsgateway.org/topics/uses-range-pastureland/riparian-grazing-management

Roath, L. R., & Krueger, W. C. (1982). Cattle grazing and behavior on a forested range. Journal of Range Management, 35(3), 332-338.

Thurman, L. L., Stein, B. A., Schwartz, M. K., Cushman, S. A., Shirk, A. J., & Olson, D. H. (2022). Treading water: Conservation of headwater-stream associated amphibians in a changing climate. Forests, 13(1), 117.

Trimble, S. W. (1994). Erosional effects of cattle on streambanks in Tennessee, U.S.A. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 19(5), 451-464.

Trout Unlimited. (2023). Habitat diversity. Retrieved from https://www.tu.org/science/conservation-research/fish-ecology/fish-habitat-linkages/habitat-diversity/

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. (2024). Colorado Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office: What we do. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/office/colorado-fish-and-wildlife-conservation/what-we-do

Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. (2024). Riparian areas. Retrieved from https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/ecosystems/riparian

Winward, A. H. (2000). Monitoring the vegetation resources in riparian areas (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-47). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Wyman, S., Bailey, D., Borman, M., Cote, S., Eisner, J., Elmore, W., Leinard, B., Leonard, S., Reed, F., Swanson, S., Van Riper, L., Westfall, T., Wiley, R., & Winward, A. (2006). Riparian area management: Grazing management processes and strategies for riparian-wetland areas (Technical Reference 1737-20). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center.