Brook Trout in a Changing Landscape

Brook Trout in a Changing Landscape: Effects of Terrestrial Practices, Sedimentation, Salinity, and Climate Stress

Introduction

Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) are an iconic, endemic species of western North Carolina and the Appalachian region (Page & Burr, 2011). As the only trout species native to the eastern U.S., it symbolizes the region’s pristine mountain streams and holds significant cultural and recreational value. However, human activities have drastically reduced their range, with many populations now isolated in fragmented headwater streams at high elevations (Hudy et al., 2008).

Beyond their recreational and cultural significance, Brook Trout play a unique and crucial ecological role in Appalachian ecosystems. As apex predators in small headwater streams, they regulate aquatic insect populations and serve as water quality indicators. They thrive only in cold, clean, well-oxygenated water (Marschall & Crowder, 1996). Protecting Brook Trout habitat is not just a matter of preserving a species but also safeguarding the delicate balance of these ecosystems for human communities by ensuring clean water sources for drinking, recreation, and fisheries (Stranko et al., 2008).

While overfishing has contributed to population declines, Brook Trout have shown remarkable resilience when habitat conditions are restored. Today, the most significant driver of decline is habitat degradation, particularly from terrestrial land-use practices. Clearing riparian forests, increased sedimentation, and chemical pollutants have dramatically altered Appalachian watersheds, creating widespread stress for Brook Trout populations (Stranko et al., 2008). However, the fact that they can bounce back when their habitat is improved gives hope for effective conservation strategies.

Brook Trout Overview

Historic Range

Brook Trout were historically widespread throughout eastern North America, ranging from eastern Canada (Newfoundland to Hudson Bay), the Great Lakes, and New England, down through the Appalachian Mountains to northern Georgia (Page & Burr, 2011). They occupied cold-water rivers, streams, and mountain lakes, thriving in habitats with stable flow and high dissolved oxygen levels.

Current Range

Today, Brook Trout populations are heavily fragmented. In the southern Appalachians, they inhabit high-elevation, forested headwater streams. At the southern end of their range, Brook Trout exist above 600 meters, where temperatures remain cold enough year-round (Meisner, 1990). In lower elevations, non-native rainbow and brown trout tolerate warmer waters and have displaced Brook Trout (Stranko et al., 2008).

Brook Trout persist in various habitats in the northern portion of their range, including large lakes, coastal rivers, and even anadromous (sea-run trout called “salters”) populations in the Northeast. In contrast, southern populations have retreated to isolated high-altitude refuges.

Life History

Brook Trout spawn in the fall (October–December) when water temperatures drop (Meisner, 1990). Spawning begins when the water temperature drops to less than 9Cº (Raleigh, 1982). Females excavate nests (redds) in clean, well-oxygenated gravel beds, often in areas with upwelling groundwater, which ensures proper oxygenation of developing embryos (Witzel & Maccrimmon, 1983).

Eggs incubate through the winter, and tiny alevins (yolk-sac fry) remain buried in the gravel for several months before emerging as fry in early spring. This stage is highly vulnerable to siltation and sedimentation. If adequate substrate burial depth and acclimation to water temperature are not achieved, it may impact growth rates or cause mortality (Raleigh, 1982). If silt or sediment clogs the gravel, it can suffocate embryos or prevent fry from successfully emerging (Stranko et al., 2008). 

Newly emerged fry occupy shallow, slow-moving stream margins before gradually shifting into riffles and pools as they grow. Juvenile Brook Trout are susceptible to habitat changes, as high turbidity, low dissolved oxygen, or poor food availability can limit growth and survival (Stranko et al., 2008).

As adults, Brook Trout specialize in cold-water environments, preferring temperatures between 10–16°C, with warm summer temperatures and low flow rates stressing populations (Xu et al., 2010). Growth rate decreases at temperatures above 16°C and is negative at 24°C, with an estimated upper limit for positive growth of 23.4°C (Chadwick & McCormick, 2017). They establish home territories in pools or deep runs. Cover is an important feature, with Brook Trout relying on undercut banks, woody debris, and overhanging vegetation for cover (Raleigh, 1982).

Ecology of Brook Trout

Brook Trout are opportunistic predators that feed primarily on aquatic insects (mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies), crustaceans, and terrestrial insects that fall into the water (Raleigh, 1982). Because they are mid-level predators, Brook Trout are integral to stream food webs. Preying on macroinvertebrates, they help regulate aquatic insect populations and influence the entire ecosystem through trophic cascades. However, declining macroinvertebrate populations due to sedimentation and pollution pose a significant challenge to Brook Trout survival (Stranko et al., 2008). Introduced non-native trouts alter Brook Trout feeding, creating additional environmental stress. When two or more trout species co-occur, Brook Trout feed more on bottom-dwelling organisms, while Brown Trout and Rainbow Trout primarily feed on organisms in the water column and on the surface (Behnke, 2002).

Major Threats

Terrestrial Practices and Habitat Disruption

Deforestation, agriculture, and urbanization have significantly impacted Brook Trout populations. Timber harvests change the suitability of streams for Brook Trout (Eschner & Lamoyeux, 2011). Deforestation removes riparian shade, increases water temperatures, and reduces the woody debris needed for habitat complexity (Stranko et al., 2008). High water temperature due to the removal of shading canopy cover is the most limiting factor in the distribution and survival of Brook Trout (Eschner & Lamoyeux, 2011). Brook Trout rely heavily on terrestrial invertebrates from surrounding forests in addition to aquatic invertebrates. Timber harvest reduces terrestrial invertebrate abundance and increases their reliance on aquatic invertebrates, primarily increasing the consumption of crayfish (Niles & Hartman, 2021). 

Agricultural runoff contributes nutrients and sediment, degrading spawning grounds and macroinvertebrate populations (Hudy et al., 2008). Livestock grazing negatively affects Brook Trout. Bank erosion and bare ground are typically higher in grazed riparian zones, which often have less woody vegetation and fewer shrubs and groundcover plants. Habitat conditions adjacent to grazed riparian zones are worse for trout (e.g., less nutrient filtration, less shading) and reduce fish growth and abundance (Sievers et al., 2017). 

Urbanization increases the number of impervious surfaces, which can lead to flashy storm flows, streambank erosion, and chemical pollution (Stranko et al., 2008). Urbanization often presents barriers to fish. Brook Trout can clear some culvert barriers, but their jumping ability depends on their body size and pool depth below the barrier. They can jump ~3.5 times their body length (Kondratieff & Myrick, 2006). Waterfall or culvert drops greater than 63.5-73.5 cm can impede habitat connectivity for Brook Trout (Kondratieff & Myrick, 2006).

Sedimentation and Siltation

High sediment loads harm Brook Trout (Eschner & Lamoyeux, 2011). Human activities causing erosion, such as housing development, road construction, and agricultural land use, introduce excess sediment into streams. Increased turbidity disrupts visual feeding and reduces foraging success (Stranko et al., 2008). Fine sediment clogs spawning gravels, suffocating eggs and alevins (Raleigh, 1982). Organic sediments require oxygenation for decomposition, which reduces dissolved oxygen available to Brook Trout respiration. Sediments can cause inflammation of gill membranes and the eventual death of young trout (Eschner & Lamoyeux, 2011). 

Salinity Challenges

Rising chloride concentrations from road salt runoff and agricultural inputs threaten Brook Trout. These fish are susceptible to elevated salinity, which disrupts osmoregulation and gill function (The Conservation Foundation, 2023). Chloride levels above 150 mg/L are linked to declining aquatic biodiversity, while 860 mg/L is lethal for many freshwater species. At 860 ppm or above, chloride can be toxic to freshwater life in just a few hours. Even at lower concentrations, chloride can still be harmful. Meador and Carlisle found chloride tolerance as low as 3.1 ppm for some Brook Trout (2007).

In addition to direct toxicity, elevated salinity can indirectly impact Brook Trout populations by altering stream macroinvertebrate communities, a critical food source. Many aquatic insects, including mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies, are susceptible to increased chloride levels, leading to declines in their abundance and diversity (Kaushal et al., 2005). As macroinvertebrate populations diminish, Brook Trout face reduced prey availability, forcing them to expend more energy searching for food or shifting to less nutritious alternatives. This nutritional stress can lead to slower growth rates, lower reproductive success, and increased vulnerability to other environmental stressors. Additionally, increased conductivity from road salts may interfere with olfactory cues that Brook Trout use for foraging and spawning site selection, further complicating their survival in impacted waterways (Hintz & Relyea, 2019).

Climate Stress

Climate change, especially warming, challenges Brook Trout. Brook Trout growth declines above 16°C and becomes negative at 24°C, with an estimated upper growth limit of 23.4°C. Elevated temperatures trigger physiological stress responses, including a sharp increase in plasma cortisol, which can be 12- to 18-fold higher at 22–24°C than at 16°C. Although plasma glucose may remain unchanged, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in the gills increases drastically, rising 11-fold at 22°C and 56-fold at 24°C compared to 16°C. Additionally, gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, essential for ion balance, drops by 53% at 24°C, with enzyme abundance decreasing 80% at that temperature. Brook Trout exposed to daily temperature swings of 4°C (19–23°C) or 8°C (17–25°C) also experience reduced growth (by 43% in length and 35% in mass at the 8°C fluctuation), with no change in plasma cortisol or glucose but a dramatic 40- to 700-fold increase in HSP70. Even after four days of recovery at 21°C, HSP70 remained elevated, only returning to normal after ten days. These results highlight how thermal stress limits Brook Trout growth and survival, helping to explain their distribution in the wild as they avoid habitats that exceed their physiological tolerance (Chadwick & McCormick, 2017). 

Climate change presents multiple overlapping challenges for Brook Trout. Increasing stream temperatures push populations into shrinking high-elevation refuges (Meisner, 1990). More frequent extreme weather events (e.g., Hurricane Helene) exacerbate stream instability and sedimentation. Altered stream flows result in droughts and flooding, further stressing populations (Merriam et al., 2017).

The interactive effects of climate change and other stressors, such as sedimentation and salinity, further compound the challenges faced by Brook Trout. Warmer temperatures can exacerbate the toxicity of contaminants like chloride. At the same time, increased precipitation and extreme weather events can lead to more frequent road salt runoff events, causing spikes in salinity levels (Cooper et al., 2014). Similarly, climate-induced shifts in streamflow patterns may increase erosion and sedimentation, further degrading spawning habitat and reducing the availability of oxygen-rich gravels for egg incubation. These combined stressors necessitate comprehensive conservation approaches that address multiple threats simultaneously.

Conservation and Management

Restoration and Sustainable Practices

Protecting and restoring riparian buffers is essential for maintaining stream temperature, stabilizing streambanks, and reducing erosion, benefiting Brook Trout populations. Reforesting riparian zones enhances shade cover, helping to regulate water temperatures and limit thermal stress on trout (Hudy et al., 2008). Additionally, implementing sustainable forestry practices, such as selective harvesting and limiting riparian timber removal to 50% of the basal area, ensures that water quality and streamflow remain stable while minimizing erosion (Niles & Hartman, 2021; Stranko et al., 2008).

Beyond forestry management, agriculture's best management practices (BMPs) are crucial in reducing nutrient and sediment runoff that can degrade Brook Trout habitat. Agricultural BMPs, such as livestock exclusion, cover cropping, and no-till farming, help limit erosion and improve water quality by reducing excess nutrient loads and sedimentation (Hudy et al., 2008). Brook Trout populations respond positively to livestock exclusion, likely due to enhanced instream habitat conditions, improved channel stability, and increased availability of terrestrial food sources (Sievers et al., 2017). Additionally, introducing large woody debris into streams has enhanced habitat complexity further and provided critical cover for Brook Trout, contributing to population stability and resilience.

By integrating riparian reforestation, sustainable forestry, agricultural BMPs, and habitat enhancement efforts, fisheries managers can improve water quality, stream structure, and overall ecosystem health, ensuring Brook Trout populations can thrive under environmental change. Table 1 in the appendix summarizes key conservation actions.

Connectivity Improvements

Restoring connectivity is about removing barriers and ensuring reconnected habitats provide suitable conditions for Brook Trout persistence. Temperature monitoring and predictive modeling can help identify which upstream habitats will remain thermally viable under future climate scenarios, guiding conservation efforts toward the most resilient populations (Isaak et al., 2015). Additionally, habitat restoration efforts should focus on maintaining connected groundwater inputs and continuous riparian vegetation to mitigate rising stream temperatures, ensuring newly connected habitats remain suitable for cold-water species. Replacing undersized culverts and removing dams reconnects fragmented populations. Restoring natural stream channels improves habitat structure (Kondratieff & Myrick, 2006).

Salinity Management

Managing road salt pollution is critical for protecting Brook Trout and other sensitive aquatic species from elevated salinity levels, which can disrupt osmoregulation and reduce survival rates. One effective strategy is improving de-icing practices by reducing excessive road salt application, using brine solutions instead of rock salt, and adopting smart salting technologies that optimize application rates based on road conditions (The Conservation Foundation, 2023). Municipalities and transportation agencies can also implement alternative de-icing materials, such as beet juice mixtures, which provide traction while minimizing chloride runoff (Lake County Division of Transportation, n.d.).

In addition to direct reductions in salt use, riparian and herbaceous buffers serve as natural filtration systems that help mitigate the impact of road salt runoff before it reaches trout streams. Vegetated buffer zones along streams and roadsides can trap and absorb contaminants, reducing chloride concentrations in waterways and preventing harmful spikes in salinity. Restoring wetlands and enhancing groundwater recharge areas further improves the landscape’s ability to dilute and filter salt-laden runoff (Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 2013; Peterson et al., 2010).

A comprehensive salinity management approach that integrates improved de-icing practices, riparian buffer restoration, and stormwater management is essential for maintaining healthy aquatic ecosystems and ensuring the long-term viability of Brook Trout populations in changing environmental conditions.

Climate Resilience

As climate change intensifies, Brook Trout face increasing threats from rising stream temperatures, habitat degradation, and extreme weather events. Conservation and management strategies must prioritize protecting and restoring cold-water habitats to ensure this species' long-term persistence. One key approach is protecting and expanding cold-water refuges in high-elevation streams, where water temperatures remain within Brook Trout’s physiological tolerance range (Meisner, 1990). Land managers can achieve this by preserving forested riparian buffers, which provide shade, reduce thermal loading, and help maintain cool stream temperatures. Restoring natural hydrology by reconnecting fragmented streams and removing barriers can improve trout access to cooler headwaters and thermal refuges.

Active stream temperature monitoring is essential to support brook trout resilience further. Regular monitoring allows managers to identify thermal stress zones and guide conservation efforts, such as targeted riparian reforestation, wetland restoration, and in-stream habitat improvements (Stranko et al., 2008). Increasing groundwater recharge through floodplain reconnection and beaver dam analogs can also help buffer temperature fluctuations by maintaining cooler base flows during warm periods (Dittbrenner et al., 2022).

A comprehensive, landscape-scale approach integrating habitat restoration, water quality improvements, and climate adaptation strategies is crucial for sustaining Brook Trout populations. By implementing science-based conservation practices, fisheries and land managers can enhance climate resilience and ensure that Brook Trout continue to thrive in an era of environmental change.

Conclusion

Brook Trout populations are in critical decline due to habitat destruction, sedimentation, salinity, and climate stress. However, their future can be secured through habitat restoration, policy changes, and community engagement. Protecting Brook Trout means protecting entire ecosystems and preserving the Appalachian’s cold-water streams, biodiversity, and water resources for future generations. The time to act is now.

REFERENCES

• Behnke, R. J. (2002). Trout and salmon of North America (1st ed.). The Free Press.

• Chadwick, J., McCormick, S. (2017). Upper thermal limits of growth in Brook Trout and their relationship to stress physiology. J Exp Biol 1 November 2017; 220 (21): 3976–3987.

• Cooper, C. A., Mayer, P. M., & Faulkner, B. R. (2014). Effects of road salts on groundwater and surface water dynamics in an urban restored stream. Science of the Total Environment, 487, 506–514.

• Dittbrenner, B. J., Schilling, J. W., Torgersen, C. E., & Lawler, J. J. (2022). Relocated beaver can increase water storage and decrease stream temperature in headwater streams. Ecosphere, 13(7), e4168.

• Eschner, A. R., & Larmoyeux, J. (1963). Logging and Trout: Four Experimental Forest Practices and their Effect on Water Quality. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 25(2), 59–67.

• Hintz, W. D., & Relyea, R. A. (2019). A review of the species, community, and ecosystem impacts of road salt salinization in fresh waters. Freshwater Science, 36(2), 153–159.

• Hudy, M., Thieling, T. M., Gillespie, N., & Smith, E. P. (2008). Distribution, status, and land use characteristics of sub-watersheds within the native range of Brook Trout in the eastern United States. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28(4), 1069–1085.

• Isaak, D. J., Wenger, S. J., Peterson, E. E., Ver Hoef, J. M., Nagel, D. E., Luce, C. H., Hostetler, S. W., & Dunham, J. B. (2015). The cold-water climate shield: Delineating refugia for preserving salmonid fishes through the 21st century. Global Change Biology, 21(7), 2540–2553.

• Kaushal, S. S., Groffman, P. M., Likens, G. E., Belt, K. T., Stack, W. P., Kelly, V. R., Band, L. E., & Fisher, G. T. (2005). Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(38), 13517–13520.

• Kondratieff, M. C., & Myrick, C. A. (2006). How high can Brook Trout jump? A laboratory evaluation of Brook Trout jumping performance. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 135(2), 361–370.

• Lake County Division of Transportation. (n.d.). Winter maintenance best practices. Lake County, Illinois. https://www.lakecountyil.gov/2284/Winter-Maintenance-Best-Practices

• Maryland Department of Natural Resources. (2013). Do road salts cause environmental impacts? https://dnr.maryland.gov/streams/Publications/RoadSalt2013.pdf

• Marschall, E. A., & Crowder, L. B. (1996). Assessing population responses to multiple anthropogenic effects: A case study with Brook Trout. Ecological Applications, 6(1), 152–167.

• Meador, M. R., & Carlisle, D. M. (2007). Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 329–338.

• Meisner, J. D. (1990). Effect of climatic warming on the southern margins of the native range of Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47(6), 1065–1070.

• Merriam, E. R., Fernandez, R., Petty, J. T., & Zegre, N. (2017). Can Brook Trout survive climate change in large rivers? If it rains. Science of The Total Environment, 607–608, 1225–1236.

• Niles, J., & Hartman, K. (2021). Riparian timber harvest intensity affects the diets of Appalachian Brook Trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 150(4), 490–502.

• Page, L. M., & Burr, B. M. (2011). Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

• Peterson, J., Stone, A., Houle, J., & Roseen, R. (2010). Protecting water resources and managing stormwater: A bird’s eye view for communities in New Hampshire and throughout New England. University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/41390

• Raleigh, R. F. (1982). Habitat suitability index models: Brook Trout. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Energy and Land Use Team.

• Sievers, M., Hale, R. & Morrongiello, J.R. (2017). Do trout respond to riparian change? A meta-analysis with implications for restoration and management. Freshwater Biology, 62: 445-457.

• Stranko, S. A., Hilderbrand, R. H., & Morgan, R. P. (2008). Brook Trout declines with land cover and temperature changes in Maryland. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28(4), 1223–1232.

• The Conservation Foundation. (2023). Impacts of road salt on freshwater ecosystems. https://theconservationfoundation.org

• U.S. Geological Survey. (2025). Salvelinus fontinalis (Brook Trout) species map. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL. Retrieved February 28, 2025, from https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/SpeciesMap.aspx?SpeciesID=939

• Witzel, L. D., & MacCrimmon, H. R. (1983). Redd-site selection by Brook Trout and brown trout in southwestern Ontario streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 112(6), 760–771.

• Xu, C. L., Letcher, B. H., & Nislow, K. H. (2010). Size-dependent survival of Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in summer: Effects of water temperature and stream flow. Journal of Fish Biology, 76(10), 2342–2369.